Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Trey Hilderbrand vs Vuk Budic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hilderbrand vs Budic analysis and find out who is favored!
Trey Hilderbrand vs Vuk Budic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hilderbrand 1 - 0 Budic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hilderbrand has won 47.22% of points on their second serve, while Budic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hilderbrand, in recent form, has won 49.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Budic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hilderbrand has saved 56.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Budic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hilderbrand has won 59.65% of matches played (W/L 34/ 23), with Budic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hilderbrand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 44/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Budic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Hilderbrand has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.22% of matches (W/L 28/ 17), where as Budic has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hilderbrand winning 1 times and Budic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hilderbrand winning 2 and Budic winning 0. The last match between Hilderbrand and Budic was at the M25 Decatur, 31-07-2019, First, Hard with Trey Hilderbrand getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hilderbrand and Budic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hilderbrand winning 0 times and Budic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hilderbrand winning 0, and Budic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hilderbrand has played against opponents with an average rank of 145.63 while Budic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hilderbrand has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Budic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hilderbrand has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Budic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
810
Rank
810
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
59% (75-52)
Career Total W/L
33% (7-14)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Trey Hilderbrand vs Vuk Budic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hilderbrand VS Budic
Sportsbook
Offer
Hilderbrand VS Budic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Trey Hilderbrand | Vuk Budic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:0 | 1:38:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (40/66) | 65% (48/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (29/40) | 52% (25/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (13/26) | 58% (15/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (34/74) | 36% (24/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Hilderbrand VS Budic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Vuk Budic
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Trey Hilderbrand | Vuk Budic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (40/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (363/325) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 197 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 107 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1227/1928) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (882/1227) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (331/701) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (77/176) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (725/1924) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Trey Hilderbrand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
3
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Gonzalo Bueno
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
102)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Leonardo Aboian
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
51 of
67)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Juan Sebastian Gomez
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Gonzalo Ariel Karakachian
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leonardo Aboian
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
3
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Vuk Budic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Rotsaert
Player
Vuk Budic
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Vuk Budic
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vuk Budic
Player
Eric Morris
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mcclain Kessler
Player
Vuk Budic
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Peck
Player
Vuk Budic
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
2
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-6(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Hidalgo
Player
Vuk Budic
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vuk Budic
Player
Michael Shabaz
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vuk Budic
Player
Aron Hiltzik
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
74 of
104)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Hilderbrand Vs Budic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hilderbrand are available here and Budic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
